Scope of this policy
This policy covers display ads, native advertising, sponsored articles, paid placements, sponsored tools, sponsor-influenced media, affiliate links, referral links, and provider coverage on 401kROBS.com. It is a reader-facing policy, not an advertising rate card, ad-sales contract, active advertiser list, campaign archive, or promise that advertising will never appear.
The policy also does not replace page-level disclosure. FTC guidance focuses on what reasonable consumers take from the full context. A separate policy page is useful background, but it is not enough if a specific ad, sponsored article, or affiliate recommendation needs a clear nearby disclosure before the reader acts. [1] [3]
Current observable site practices
The statements below are limited to the current application files and public trust pages checked for this policy. They should be rechecked if the site adds new ad units, sponsor formats, lead forms, newsletters, or third-party scripts.
- The footer states that 401kROBS.com currently has no affiliate relationships and does not earn commissions from provider links.
- The current provider-match methodology says the questionnaire does not collect contact details, store a lead, call a CRM, or transmit answers to providers. [5]
- The current provider-match methodology says affiliate relationship, referral program status, provider name recognition, and provider slug do not add points. [5]
- A source search of the current application code found no active affiliate disclosure route, Google display-ad script, adsbygoogle placement, DoubleClick reference, or dedicated sponsored-content route. This observation is limited to the checked repository state, not a promise about future deployments.
Advertising, sponsored content, affiliate links, and editorial coverage
These categories can overlap. For example, a provider button can be both editorially relevant and an affiliate link, while a sponsor-paid article can still contain factual educational material. The important reader question is whether a commercial relationship could affect how the content is understood. If so, the relationship should be disclosed clearly and close to the relevant content. [1] [3]
Label wording, placement, and proximity standards
Advertising labels should use plain language such as Ad, Advertisement, Paid Advertisement, Sponsored, Sponsored Advertising Content, or Paid placement from [sponsor]. FTC native-ad guidance warns that labels such as promoted or promoted stories can be ambiguous depending on context, so this site should not rely on vague labels when the commercial nature is unclear. [1]
For article-style native ads, the label should appear where the reader will notice it before clicking or reading as editorial content, often at or above the headline and again on the destination page if the full article is sponsored. [1] For affiliate recommendations, the possible commission should be disclosed before or near the link or recommendation, not only after the click. [3] For tools or rankings, a sponsored placement should be visibly separated from organic results so it is not confused with a methodology output. [1] [5]
Do not make paid content look independent. FTC policy treats format as part of the claim. A true product claim can still be presented deceptively if the ad is formatted to look like impartial publisher content. [2]
Editorial and scoring separation
The current provider-match methodology gives score points for business funding goal, rollover amount, employee administration, setup timing, service priority, additional financing, and specialist support. It states that affiliate relationship, referral program status, provider name recognition, and provider slug do not add points. [5]
That methodology supports a narrow current-state statement: commercial relationships should not determine provider-match scoring. It does not guarantee every future ad product, provider contract, or page format. A paid placement should not be inserted into rankings, tool results, provider comparisons, or methodology language in a way that makes the placement look earned by the same criteria unless that is true and disclosed.
Provider coverage should continue to distinguish provider-reported facts from editorial judgment. Compensation cannot prove a provider is safer, more compliant, less expensive, more suitable, or better for a specific ROBS transaction. Readers should verify current fees, contract scope, employee administration, valuation support, Form 5500 support, audit support, exit support, and professional-review needs directly with the provider and appropriate advisers. [4] [5] [6]
Unacceptable formats, reader costs, data, endorsements, and reporting
This policy should not be read as a legal compliance guarantee or as a promise that every advertising issue can be identified before publication. It sets the site standard for reader transparency. The following formats are not acceptable under that standard:
- A paid placement that looks like an independent article, provider review, calculator result, source library entry, editor pick, ranking, or methodology output without a clear advertising label. [1] [2]
- A label that relies only on vague words such as promoted, featured, partner, brand studio, or preferred when the commercial nature is not otherwise clear. [1]
- A disclosure hidden only in the footer, About page, affiliate disclosure, this policy, tooltip, hover state, terms page, or post-click landing page when the reader sees a commercial recommendation before that disclosure. [1] [3]
- A provider claim that says or implies guaranteed compliance, IRS approval, audit-safe setup, best provider, safest provider, lowest cost, guaranteed approval, or risk-free use of retirement assets unless the exact narrower claim is supported and properly qualified.
If an ad or affiliate link says there is no added cost to the reader, that means 401kROBS.com does not separately charge the reader for using the link. It does not prove that a provider has the lowest price, that the provider's marketing costs never affect pricing, or that a reader could not negotiate different terms elsewhere. If a future advertising format collects personal data or sends a lead to a provider, the page should disclose what is collected, who receives it, whether contact consent is required, and how consent can be withdrawn before collection.
Endorsements, testimonials, reviews, badges, expert quotes, or provider claims should not appear in advertising unless material connections are disclosed and the claim is otherwise supportable. FTC endorsement guidance treats unexpected payment, referral, business, family, personal, or other benefit connections as material connections when they could affect how consumers evaluate the endorsement. [3]
To report an unclear ad label, outdated disclosure, unsupported provider claim, broken source, or confusing commercial placement, use the current public trust destinations: the About page, Editorial Policy, author page, and provider methodology. The site does not currently publish a dedicated correction-request form, advertising contact, correction email address, or correction service-level agreement.
Sources and verification destinations
FTC sources explain native-ad, deceptively formatted advertisement, endorsement, and material-connection principles. Internal sources establish only the current observable site disclosures, methodology, and trust boundaries.
[1]FTC Native Advertising: A Guide for Businesses
FTC business guidance on native ads, transparency, labels, proximity, placement, and terms that may be ambiguous.
[2]FTC Enforcement Policy Statement on Deceptively Formatted Advertisements
FTC policy statement that ads may be deceptive when format misleads consumers into believing advertising is independent content.
[3]FTC Endorsement Guides FAQ
FTC staff guidance on material connections, affiliate links, clear disclosures, and disclosure proximity.
[5]Provider match methodology
Current site methodology for provider scoring, data collection limits, lead-handling limits, ranking exclusions, and due-diligence limits.
[6]Editorial Policy
Current site policy for evidence hierarchy, provider-reported claims, commercial separation, corrections, and professional-review boundaries.
[10]Corrections Policy
Current site policy for reader error reports, material corrections, provider-sensitive changes, visible notes, and correction limits.
[7]Fact-Checking Policy
Current site policy for claim checks, source labels, citation proximity, provider-date treatment, and correction limits.