Employer-stock valuation checklist
Create a readiness file for ROBS employer-stock valuation work: scope, independence, company records, financial support, methods documentation, conflicts, fiduciary review, and handoff evidence. The tool does not value stock or decide compliance.
How to use the checklist
Start with the checklist facts, then keep each status tied to a record a fiduciary or reviewer can find later.
- Select only documented facts. Unknown purpose, transaction, conflict, rights, forecast, specialist, and reporting-stage facts become follow-up prompts.
- For each task, choose not-started, in-progress, complete, or N/A. Completed tasks require an evidence/reference note. Manual N/A requires a reason.
- Use document locations, binder names, and questions. Do not enter private business figures, participant data, tax IDs, customer names, payroll details, or stock values.
- Copy the final task list into sponsor-controlled records if needed. Refreshing or leaving the page can clear the session.
Example workflow
A year-end reporting review might start by confirming the valuation date and intended use, then collecting corporate records, current financial statements, prior valuation support, and TPA reporting needs. If the plan also has a redemption, distribution, sale, financing, or other employer-stock transaction, the transaction task stays applicable and adds conflict, allocation, and counsel handoff questions.[1]
A formation purchase or new-stock transaction should not rely only on a promoter or provider label. The file should identify who scoped the work, who paid the specialist, what standards were followed, which information was supplied, what limitations exist, and how fiduciaries reviewed the result.[1][2]
Limitations and red flags
The checklist separates document readiness from valuation judgment so gaps are escalated instead of treated as clearance.
- No valuation output: no FMV, range, discount, multiple, rating or binary compliance conclusion.
- No false annual-appraisal mandate: cadence and scope depend on plan documents, transactions, reporting, fiduciary duties, auditor/TPA needs, and facts.
- Red flags include promoter-directed valuation, undisclosed referral compensation, missing cap table records, unsupported forecasts, unexplained discounts, related-party transactions, stale prior reports, and reports that do not state reliance limits.
- DOL proposed adequate-consideration rules, if consulted elsewhere, must be treated as proposed unless finalized. This page relies on current statutory and agency materials and does not present proposed rules as binding.
Questions for the appraiser, TPA, CPA, and counsel
Use these questions to assign each valuation issue to the professional responsible for scope, reporting, tax, plan administration, or legal review.
- What valuation date, purpose, intended users, standard of value, premise, and report type are being used?
- Which professional standards apply: AICPA SSVS, ASA standards, USPAP, another credential requirement, or engagement-specific rules?
- What independence, compensation, referral, prior-service, and reliance-limit disclosures should fiduciaries review?
- How are control, marketability, restrictions, voting rights, buy-sell provisions, and share classes addressed?
- Which records does the TPA or auditor need for Form 5500, participant statements, allocations, redemptions, distributions, or plan termination?
- Which related-party facts or prohibited-transaction questions require ERISA counsel before reliance?
Checklist universe
The model contains 15 stable tasks across engagement independence/scope, valuation date and purpose, company/legal/capitalization records, financial statements/tax returns/normalization, forecasts/assumptions, industry/market data, stock rights/discounts/control/marketability, methods and reconciliation, employer-stock transactions/allocations, conflicts/prohibited-transaction review, appraiser qualifications/reliance limits, report completeness, fiduciary review/decision record, and retention/handoff.
Privacy and browser-local operation
The checklist has no lead form, account, cookies, local storage, network submission, URL query output, clipboard access, reminder function, or private-data field. The interface asks for documented applicability facts and evidence references only, not private business figures.
Frequently asked questions
These answers clarify what the checklist can support and where professional valuation or legal judgment remains outside the tool.
Sources checked August 13, 2026
The source list separates federal authority, agency education, and professional valuation standards so readers can see what each source supports.
- [1] IRS Rollovers as Business Start-Ups Compliance Project
Official IRS page last reviewed November 16, 2025 and checked August 13, 2026. It says ROBS plans are not considered abusive tax-avoidance transactions but are questionable, warns determination letters do not protect incorrect operation, says compliance checks requested stock valuation and stock purchases, and lists promoter fees and valuation of assets among problem areas.
- [2] DOL Fiduciary Responsibilities
Official DOL page checked August 13, 2026. It states fiduciaries must act solely in participants' and beneficiaries' interests, act prudently, diversify to minimize large losses, follow plan documents consistent with ERISA, and avoid conflicts of interest.
- [3] ERISA section 3 definitions
Statutory text checked August 13, 2026. Used for adequate-consideration and current-value concepts, including FMV or good-faith fiduciary determination language in the relevant definitions.
- [4] ERISA section 404 fiduciary duties
Statutory text checked August 13, 2026. Used for fiduciary prudence, loyalty, diversification, and plan-document framing.
- [5] ERISA section 406 prohibited transactions
Statutory text checked August 13, 2026. Used for related-party and fiduciary self-dealing escalation prompts, not for tool-level clearance.
- [6] DOL Understanding Retirement Plan Fees and Expenses
Official DOL publication checked August 13, 2026. Used for service-provider selection and monitoring concepts.
- [7] AICPA Statement on Standards for Valuation Services VS Section 100
AICPA resource checked August 13, 2026. It says AICPA members performing valuation engagements to estimate value are required to follow VS Section 100, subject to exceptions. This is professional practice, not federal law.
- [8] ASA Business Valuation Standards
Professional valuation standards source checked August 13, 2026. Classified as professional practice, not federal law.
- [9] The Appraisal Foundation USPAP
Professional appraisal standards source checked August 13, 2026. Applicability depends on the appraiser, credential, engagement, law, and user requirements; not presented as a universal ROBS legal mandate.
Authorship, disclosure, and date
Written for 401kROBS by Dennis Shirshikov. Published 2026-08-13; last modified 2026-08-13. 401kROBS may earn compensation from some provider relationships, but this tool does not rate providers, recommend appraisers or providers, calculate value, or use compensation as an input.