Skip to main content
401kROBSCheck eligibility
Legal triage tool

ROBS Prohibited-Transaction Screener

Use this browser-local decision tree to separate ERISA Title I and IRC section 4975 concepts, capture unknowns, and decide what needs ERISA counsel, tax adviser, TPA, valuation, or recordkeeping review before moving money or documenting a completed transaction.

Direct answer: the tool never says a transaction is cleared, exempt, compliant, or low concern. It produces one of four bounded next-action tiers: stop and obtain ERISA/tax counsel review before proceeding, prompt specialist review, document and verify, or insufficient facts.

Private by design

No names, values, emails, cookies, storage, query strings, clipboard, or network submission. Repeat, reset, and rerun results stay local to the page.

Enter documented facts only

Do not enter private names, account values, EINs, email addresses, or customer records. Unknown is a valid input.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Parties and relationships

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Employer-security records

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Exemption and status records

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Use unknown when documents do not answer this fact.

Results match the current inputs.

Decision tier

Insufficient facts

Primary U.S. Code, IRS, and DOL sources checked August 13, 2026. This browser-local model is legal/compliance triage, not a prohibited-transaction determination, exemption opinion, correction calculator, tax advice, or legal advice.

Tier

Insufficient facts

Reason codes

1

Reason codes

  • party-transaction-loan-credit: Plan transaction with a party-in-interest/disqualified-person lane. Next: Gather party and asset-lane documentation before relying on any lower triage tier.

Triggered facts

  • Asset lane: mixed-or-unclear.
  • Asset/property lane: mixed-or-unclear.
  • Benefit or conflict: unknown.
  • Category: loan or extension of credit.
  • Plan involvement: unknown.
  • Relationships: unknown.
  • Timing: proposed.
  • Title I coverage documented: unknown.

Missing facts and follow-up

  • Title I coverage is unknown; do not assume ERISA Title I applies or does not apply.
  • Plan involvement is unknown.
  • Asset lane is mixed or unclear; identify whether the property is a plan asset, corporate asset, owner asset, or unrelated corporate asset.
  • Relationship status unknown: employer/sponsor.
  • Relationship status unknown: fiduciary.
  • Relationship status unknown: 50 percent owner threshold.
  • Relationship status unknown: statutory family relationship.
  • Relationship status unknown: service provider.
  • Relationship status unknown: controlled entity.
  • Relationship status unknown: other potentially related party.
  • Party-in-interest and disqualified-person facts are unknown.

Why it matters, questions, and sources

  • ERISA section 406(a) and IRC section 4975(c)(1) use similar transaction categories but different status labels. A party in interest under ERISA is not always documented the same way as an IRC disqualified person, so both lanes need a source-backed review.
    • Which plan, trust, corporation, owner, fiduciary, service provider, family member, or controlled entity is on each side?
    • Is the property or money a plan asset, a corporate asset, an owner asset, or unclear?
    • Sources: ERISA-3-14, ERISA-406, IRC-4975

Next actions

  • Gather party and asset-lane documentation before relying on any lower triage tier.

How to use the screener

Start with documents, not conclusions. Select proposed or completed, transaction category, asset lane, parties, Title I coverage, plan involvement, benefit or conflict, employer-security records, and any exemption claim. Unknown answers are expected when attribution, family status, controlled entities, plan assets, or exemption conditions have not been reviewed.

Use the output as a worklist. Each reason code shows triggered facts, missing facts, why the fact matters, questions or evidence, exact authority IDs, and the responsible next action. Completed transactions add a correction, filing, and excise-tax consultation prompt without prescribing a correction.

Deterministic decision model

The model checks contradictions first, then evaluates fiduciary self-dealing, plan transactions with parties in interest or disqualified persons, employer-security conditions, exemption claims, compensation or reimbursement caveats, completed-transaction consultation, and finally corporate-only documentation. Reason-code order is stable and tier precedence prevents false reassurance when a claimed exemption appears with a stronger stop condition.

ERISA section 406(a) categories and IRC section 4975(c)(1) categories overlap, but the status labels are not identical. ERISA uses party in interest for Title I plans; IRC section 4975 uses disqualified person and may apply even when Title I coverage is documented no or unknown. [4] [7]

Definitions used by the tool

Party in interest is an ERISA Title I term. ERISA section 3(14) includes fiduciaries, plan service providers, covered employers, certain 50 percent owners, statutory relatives, controlled entities, officers, directors, employees, 10 percent shareholders, partners, and joint venturers. The statutory relative definition is spouse, ancestor, lineal descendant, or spouse of a lineal descendant; siblings are not listed unless attribution or entity facts create another relationship. [1] [2]

Disqualified person is the IRC section 4975 status term. Fiduciary status depends on functions performed, including discretionary plan or asset control, paid investment advice, or discretionary plan administration. The screener does not decide either status. [3] [7]

Plan assets and corporate assets are separated. A ROBS plan may own employer stock, and the corporation may own business assets. The tool does not automatically treat every corporate asset as a plan asset; it flags mixed or unclear lanes for documentation and professional review. [8]

Representative branches

The input set covers common ROBS questions without private facts or account values. Test branches include: Owner/company loan; Owner-owned property lease with corporate-boundary review; Personal-expense transfer or use; Provider services and fees; Reasonable compensation with plan-asset caveat; Initial employer-stock purchase; Later stock redemption or sale; Family or controlled-entity transaction under statutory definitions; Plan paying a corporate expense; Unrelated corporate transaction with no plan asset, related party, benefit, or plan involvement.

Owner/company loan

Use neutral facts: category, asset lane, parties, plan involvement, benefit or conflict, Title I coverage, employer-security records, and exemption documentation. The answer remains a next-action tier, not a legal determination.

Owner-owned property lease with corporate-boundary review

Use neutral facts: category, asset lane, parties, plan involvement, benefit or conflict, Title I coverage, employer-security records, and exemption documentation. The answer remains a next-action tier, not a legal determination.

Personal-expense transfer or use

Use neutral facts: category, asset lane, parties, plan involvement, benefit or conflict, Title I coverage, employer-security records, and exemption documentation. The answer remains a next-action tier, not a legal determination.

Provider services and fees

Use neutral facts: category, asset lane, parties, plan involvement, benefit or conflict, Title I coverage, employer-security records, and exemption documentation. The answer remains a next-action tier, not a legal determination.

Reasonable compensation with plan-asset caveat

Use neutral facts: category, asset lane, parties, plan involvement, benefit or conflict, Title I coverage, employer-security records, and exemption documentation. The answer remains a next-action tier, not a legal determination.

Initial employer-stock purchase

Use neutral facts: category, asset lane, parties, plan involvement, benefit or conflict, Title I coverage, employer-security records, and exemption documentation. The answer remains a next-action tier, not a legal determination.

Later stock redemption or sale

Use neutral facts: category, asset lane, parties, plan involvement, benefit or conflict, Title I coverage, employer-security records, and exemption documentation. The answer remains a next-action tier, not a legal determination.

Family or controlled-entity transaction under statutory definitions

Use neutral facts: category, asset lane, parties, plan involvement, benefit or conflict, Title I coverage, employer-security records, and exemption documentation. The answer remains a next-action tier, not a legal determination.

Plan paying a corporate expense

Use neutral facts: category, asset lane, parties, plan involvement, benefit or conflict, Title I coverage, employer-security records, and exemption documentation. The answer remains a next-action tier, not a legal determination.

Unrelated corporate transaction with no plan asset, related party, benefit, or plan involvement

Use neutral facts: category, asset lane, parties, plan involvement, benefit or conflict, Title I coverage, employer-security records, and exemption documentation. The answer remains a next-action tier, not a legal determination.

Limitations and red flags

This is legal/compliance triage, not a prohibited-transaction determination, exemption opinion, correction calculator, excise-tax calculation, fiduciary opinion, tax advice, or legal advice. It does not determine plan-asset status, fiduciary status, party status, disqualified-person status, exemption availability, correction amount, taxable period, Form 5330 obligation, excise tax, liability, or whether a transaction can be unwound.

Red flags include plan cash or plan-owned stock moving to or benefiting an owner, fiduciary, service provider, sponsor, statutory family member, or controlled entity; owner/company loans; owner-property leases; plan payment of corporate or personal expenses; undocumented employer-security valuation or no-commission conditions; completed transactions; and exemption claims without condition-by-condition support.

Questions for counsel, TPA, CPA, valuation adviser, and fiduciaries

Ask who owns the asset, who is on each side, whether the plan or participant account is affected, who exercised discretion, which Title I and IRC statuses are documented, whether family attribution or controlled-entity facts are unresolved, whether employer-security conditions are documented, and which exact statutory, class, or individual exemption is claimed. Keep the source memo beside the transaction file rather than relying on provider marketing or a generic checklist.

Sources checked August 13, 2026

  1. [1] ERISA section 3(14), 29 U.S.C. 1002(14)

    Defines party in interest, including fiduciaries, service providers, covered employers, certain 50 percent owners, statutory relatives, controlled entities, officers, directors, employees, 10 percent shareholders, partners, and joint venturers.

  2. [2] ERISA section 3(15), 29 U.S.C. 1002(15)

    Defines relative for Title I party-in-interest purposes as spouse, ancestor, lineal descendant, or spouse of a lineal descendant.

  3. [3] ERISA section 3(21), 29 U.S.C. 1002(21)

    Defines fiduciary status by discretionary control over plan management or assets, investment advice for a fee, or discretionary plan administration.

  4. [4] ERISA section 406, 29 U.S.C. 1106

    Prohibits specified plan-party-in-interest transactions and fiduciary self-dealing for Title I plans unless an exemption applies.

  5. [5] ERISA section 407, 29 U.S.C. 1107

    Limits acquisition and holding of employer securities and employer real property; includes qualifying employer security concepts.

  6. [6] ERISA section 408, 29 U.S.C. 1108

    Contains statutory exemptions and DOL exemption procedure; exemptions are conditional and do not relieve other fiduciary duties.

  7. [7] IRC section 4975, 26 U.S.C. 4975

    Defines disqualified-person prohibited transactions, exemptions, correction, taxable period, amount involved, and excise taxes.

  8. [8] IRS Rollovers as Business Start-Ups Compliance Project

    Describes ROBS mechanics and observed issues including prohibited transactions, valuation, discrimination, promoter fees, missing filings, unsuccessful businesses, and determination-letter limits.

  9. [9] DOL prohibited transaction exemptions

    DOL materials explain individual, class, and statutory prohibited-transaction exemption materials and exemption procedures.

  10. [10] IRS correcting plan errors

    IRS correction materials direct plan sponsors to applicable correction programs; this screener does not calculate correction amounts or deadlines.

Frequently asked questions

Does this decide whether a prohibited transaction occurred?

No. It identifies documented red flags, unknowns, and next actions. It does not determine plan-asset status, fiduciary status, party-in-interest status, disqualified-person status, exemptions, correction amounts, tax, liability, or deadlines.

Does ERISA Title I apply to every ROBS plan?

No. The screener asks for documented Title I coverage as yes, no, or unknown. IRC section 4975 may still matter even when Title I coverage is documented no or remains unknown.

Are corporate assets automatically plan assets because a ROBS plan owns company stock?

No. The tool separates plan assets, corporate assets, owner assets, mixed facts, and unrelated corporate assets. Corporate assets are not automatically plan assets, but a related-party or unclear-relationship lease, loan, service, use, compensation, or employer-security benefit can still require counsel and TPA review for relationship classification, ownership attribution, indirect plan involvement, fiduciary conduct, value flow, terms, fairness, and exemption evidence.

Can a claimed exemption produce a clearance?

No. Statutory, class, and individual exemptions are conditional. The output treats exemption claims as facts to verify, not as clearance.

Authorship, disclosure, and privacy: Written and source-checked for 401kROBS.com by Dennis Shirshikov. Published 2026-08-13; last modified 2026-08-13. Educational content may include affiliate-supported related pages elsewhere on the site, but this tool has no lead form and does not compare providers. Inputs are processed in the browser only.